Turnover: measuring portfolio reallocation
Turnover measures the share of portfolio capital reallocated between rebalances. It connects changes in holdings to the trading costs a strategy incurs and helps assess how sensitive an allocation is to new information.
This article defines one-way turnover, explains its annualization, and compares turnover across allocation methods. It then shows how trading-cost assumptions enter the assessment of those methods.
Definition
For weights \(w_{i,t}\) and \(w_{i,t-1}\) at consecutive rebalance dates, one-way turnover for that rebalance is
\[\tau_t = \frac{1}{2} \sum_{i} \left| w_{i,t} - w_{i,t-1} \right|.\]
The one-half factor avoids double-counting a dollar that moves out of one position and into another. Annualized turnover sums \(\tau_t\) across all rebalances in a year, or scales a shorter evaluation period to a one-year basis. A value of \(1.0\) means the portfolio's capital was, on net, fully reallocated once over the period measured.
Trading costs and allocation stability
Each reallocated dollar incurs bid-ask spread and market impact. Turnover also measures weight stability across rebalance dates. Large reallocations following small changes in estimated returns or covariances indicate a sensitive allocation method.
Annualized one-way turnover by allocation method, same evaluation interval
| Method | Annualized turnover | Average HHI |
|---|---|---|
| Equal weight | 0.00 | 0.167 |
| Trailing ICIR | 1.64 | 0.172 |
| Hierarchical risk parity | 0.42 | 0.250 |
| Nominal mean-variance | 0.06 | 0.499 |
| CVaR-robust mean-variance | 0.26 | 0.495 |
The walk-forward study in robust portfolio optimization reports annualized turnover of 1.64 for trailing-ICIR weighting, compared with 0.06 for nominal mean-variance and 0.26 for the CVaR-robust variant. Trailing ICIR had an average HHI of 0.172, close to equal weighting at 0.167, while changes in its estimates produced frequent reallocations. In this comparison, it maintained broad allocation across candidates at the cost of higher turnover.
Transaction-cost treatment
The allocator's walk-forward evaluation applies a 5-basis-point transaction cost to each unit of turnover. Reported net returns and Sharpe ratios include the cost of rebalancing.
Further reading
- Richard C. Grinold and Ronald N. Kahn, Active Portfolio Management: A Quantitative Approach for Producing Superior Returns and Controlling Risk, McGraw-Hill, 2nd edition, 2000 (ISBN 978-0-07-024882-3). Develops the turnover and trading-cost tradeoffs referenced here.
- Roger G. Clarke, Harindra de Silva, and Steven Thorley,
“Portfolio Constraints and the Fundamental Law of Active Management”,
Financial Analysts Journal, 2002. Examines how position constraints, closely related to turnover under rebalancing, affect achievable information ratios.
This walkthrough is for research and educational purposes. It illustrates how strategynet.ai organizes signal evidence into factors and scenarios. It provides no recommendation, investment advice, or instruction to trade any security.
Back to Insights